Wednesday, March 5, 2008

THE MORNING AFTER

Hate to say I saw it coming, but…

There’s no question in my mind Obama and his team took their eye off the ball the past few days and let the Clinton team take the lead.

Obama’s team has been very good at quick, almost instant, responses to attacks. They’d been doing that all along, But in the past several days, he’d been acting like the presumptive candidate and quickly answering any McCain attacks while seeming to brush aside Hilary’s, like they were “silly”—as he often accurately described them in their last few debates.

But it came across, at least to this observer, who is a fan of his, a little arrogant. Not a smart move. He did it again last night, making the point that he has more delegates. He should have kept his status as the guy who came out of nowhere, not the prince waiting for the king to die.

The grace and even humility that got him all the attention in the first place, in his great speech at the last Democratic presidential nominating convention, seemed to become aloofness and cockiness, not a smart move.

I’m afraid this all benefits McCain and the Republicans. It’s a long way to November, but if there had been a national election anytime in the past several months, the Republicans would have been blown out of the water, with not enough votes to keep any power in the Congress or the White House.

Unfortunately, if the Democratic race continues as it has over the past few days, and hopefully it won’t, but… If it does, it will only strengthen the Republicans.

If the Clinton team keeps disparaging Obama’s experience and record and the Obama team keeps failing to respond quickly and strongly to the allegations (as it unfortunately did when it came to the NAFTA/Canada debacle and the absence of meetings of his Afghanistan sub-committee), then I’m afraid the Republicans may pick up the slack, either by the Democrats losing the enthusiasm of some supporters who will just stay home on election day if their candidate doesn’t get the nomination, or will vote for McCain in protest to what happened (or happens) to their candidate.

In other words, if Hilary wins the nomination by running negative ads against Obama, there’s a strong possibility that those who are energized and inspired by Obama’s candidacy will either stay home on election day or vote for McCain out of resentment, perhaps doing for the Republicans what they have been unable to do for themselves, finally breaking the longtime and until now unbreakable alliance between the majority of African-Americans and the Democratic party.

And those ads of hers will only backfire in the race against McCain. Because I’m sure a majority of “white men” as well as many women and Hispanics and even African-Americans, if given the choice between who will answer the metaphoric red phone in the White House in the middle of the night, will choose McCain over her. Correctly, or not.

All in all, it wasn’t a good night for the Democrats, and the next several weeks don’t look so good either. Obama has to get his game back, and Clinton has to go positive again. And one of them has to have a decisive win that ends it.

None of these scenarios look promising right now, but Obama getting his game back is the most probable. Let’s hope. And of course, there's always the strong possibility that McCain and the Republicans will shoot themselves in the metaphric foot (or in Cheney's case, in their best friend's real, not metaphoric, face).

11 comments:

Harryn Studios said...

haven't been tracking this nearly as well as you do, but i can say that for the past week there seems to be a lot less obama air time than usual - and a lot less excitement about the notion of 'change' ...
more talk about pissin' contests, campaign strategies, and eventualities than platforms ...
i truly hope the dems don't self destruct or pile 'it' so high that the repubs find it easy to bury them ...
i can't imagine another four years of more of the same - that's the glaring reality rising ...

AlamedaTom said...

Lal:

According to Johnathan Alter and MANY other analysts Hillary cannot win even if she wins Pennsylvania and a bunch of other primaries that she probably has no hope of winning. He refers us to State's delegate calculator, at http://www.slate.com/id/2185278/. Check it out. It's fun to play with.

~ Willy

AlamedaTom said...

Here is Alter's article in Newsweek explaining why Hillary cannot win:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/118240

Anonymous said...

From today's post by Dylan Loewe on HuffingtonPost: "Hillary—The New Huckabee," an echo of what you just said, Mike, along with the contention that delegate-wise, she doesn't have what it takes to win.
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dylan-loewe/hillary-the-new-huckabe_b_89965.html)


"Up until now, the lengthening of the campaign calendar has benefited Obama. He has had the opportunity to meet many more voters, build well-financed organizations in a number of key states, and improve the voter's view of his electability and readiness to lead. It is possible, therefore, that an additional seven weeks of primary campaigning could continue to strengthen the Obama candidacy.

But as Hillary continues to sharpen her attacks, she may slowly weaken Obama, raising questions gently about his religion and aggressively about his readiness. If his message is muted, and his candidacy weakened, it will not change the ultimate calculus. Barack Obama will be the Democratic nominee. And if Hillary's lasting contribution to the party is hurting his chances for victory, she will have done nothing more than shown herself to be a selfish liability: the new Mike Huckabee."

Anonymous said...

Obama was tarnished by all the talk of his connection to Tony Rezko this past week.

As the press looks closer at him they will see that he is not what he paints himself as.

Hitlery has opened the quiver and all arrows will be in flight as the Pa primary nears.

These two look almost as bad as Jefferson attacking Adams.

Once they start the bleeding, Mc Cain will come across as the more mature and respectable candidate.

I agree that the phone commercial had the same effect as John Kerry's ostrich and wind surfing.

I actually thought it was a McCain ad.

JIm said...

The Kid,

I think Huckabee was actually a help to McCain and the Republicans, in that he kept some of the interest alive in the process. I wish we could graft Huckabee’s speaking skills on to McCain. The challenge for Republicans will be to keep the message of low taxes, strong military, smaller govt., and fiscal discipline (zero earmarks) message in front of the voters while the Democrat race continues. A Republican can only hope that Barak and Hillary continue the contest until it arrives here in Denver.

PS. Who says talk radio is losing its influence? Rush seems to have been successful in getting conservative Republicans to come out and vote for Hillary in order to keep the race going. I do think party rules are stupid in those states that allow cross over voting.

JIm said...

Global Warming Update:

We should become knowledgeable as voters, because some politicans from both parties and the bureaucrats from the UN plan to spending massive amounts of our tax dollars to fix a problem that many respected scientist believe does not exist.


source http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=58024





HEAT OF THE MOMENT
Scientists meet in NYC
to challenge Gore, U.N.
Hundreds of experts assert 'alarmists'
in climate debate 'have had their say'

________________________________________
Posted: March 04, 2008
2:28 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily


NEW YORK – Global warming is a natural process, not likely the result of human activities, argued more than 100 internationally prominent environmental scientists in papers presented at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change, which concluded here today

Lally said...

Tom, the way I heard it broken down, neither of them will have enough delegates to clearly win without the super delegates weighing in. And there's several ways to look at who's actually winning: 1) Obama obviously won many more states,and he actually also is ahead in the popular vote over all, if you don't count Michigan and Florida who were penalized for moving their primaries up against the Democratic Party's rules, but now want their delegates seated, but how to proportion them since Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, etc. 2) as an analyst stated today on my local (NYC) NPR talk show, if you count the electoral college votes for the counties that Obama and Clinton have won, which means pretending they will win the popular votes in those same counties, which is highly unlikely in many cases, especillay for Obama in several Southern states, but even if you say he wins where he won the primaries, she ends up with a lot more electoral college votes. Which will be a big hmmmm... for the Democratic Party elders, wheoever they may turn out to be.
And as for the allegations about Obama and the supposed mobster who donated money to Obama's campaign, he gave the money to charity and otherwise there is nothing illegal or even unethical that Obama has done. But that won't stop the rightwingers from making unfounded allegations (Vince Foster's suicide anyone?), who are easy enough to spot by their use of the quote Democrat unquote Party, because they can't stand to say "Democratic" just like they never referred to Bill Clinton as "Mister President" when he was president, but instead called him Mister Clinton, etc. etc. Which unfortunately works well on the weaker minds of the rightwing base. Unfortunately, the Clinton campaign is using innuendo, "questions raised" etc. about Obama and the seedy Chicago guy as well, even though they know there is nothing more there than campaign donations and they have still refused to reveal who their big donors are. Let's not even go into the republican big donors who were allowed to write their own legislation over the past several years when Republicans owned the congress and White House. talk about selling out your country.

Tore Claesson said...

I have little to add. Your observations are brilliant in my mind. By the way, I'm an Obama fan at this point. Not that I, or anybody, knows what kind of president he'll make, but there's something, i can't put my finger on it, that smells good.

Tore Claesson said...

oh, the phone ad. well, that was probably a very stupid move by the Clinton side. If she becomes the Dem's candidate, it will be held against her against Mac. He's liked by many who's not diehard dems.

Anonymous said...

"And as for the allegations about Obama and the supposed mobster who donated money to Obama's campaign, he gave the money to charity and otherwise there is nothing illegal or even unethical that Obama has done. But that won't stop the rightwingers from making unfounded allegations"

This bit of turnabout is high comedy considering there are no supposed "right-wingers" in the 'Democratic Party' presidential campaign.

'Smear tactics' have always been the realm of party politics for the Dems. Truth has never been smear, but distorted Truth is smear. " Does Obama still beat his wife?" "Is Hillary still the beard for Bill's back room dealings?" These are lines more fitting to the Enquirer than the NY Times.

I enjoyed the way that Howard "The Duck" Dean's attack on McCain's integrity was blown off by the public. (Yeeeeeee Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa)

I am particularly enjoying the call for re-counts in some counties and the Florida/Michigan situation. Looks so much like Dem policy in 2000 and 2004. Makes the GOP look very classy and mature.

If only we could tell which side of the mouth they were speaking from in their speeches.